A Few Thoughts About Disliking “Change” In Comics. Or Ice Cream.

10492273_10203159472400705_5082000371930497149_nby Aaron Einhorn
This past weekend was the San Diego Comic Con. Also known as SDCC, or Comic-Con International, or “Where Hollywood reveals all the nerd news fit to print for a year and we also occasionally talk a little bit about comics.” Unsurprisingly, a lot of news came out, and this was right on the heel of the announcements about Thor Odinson losing Mjolnir and the hammer being taken up by a new female character who will, initially at least, go by the moniker of Thor – and the news that Steve Rogers will age rapidly and his former partner Sam Wilson (aka The Falcon) will take up the shield and title of Captain America for the near-future.

(I say near future because we all know that by the time Avengers: Age of Ultron is in theatres, Steve Rogers will be Captain America again, and Thor Odinson will once more be the God of Thunder.)

Coming out of Comic-Con, we’ve gotten footage from Arrow, Gotham, Age of Ultron, Superman vs. Batman: Dawn of Justice. We’ve seen new costume designs, heard casting announcements, and sequels have been given dates.

10478135_10203171072570702_4554904111003099747_nSome people have been happy about bits of this news. Others have had criticisms. And some people have reacted to the criticisms by saying words to the effect of “God, you fanboys suck. All you’ve ever wanted was to see X (where X can be a combination of characters on the same screen, or a well-loved character finally getting a live action representation, or more diversity in comic line-ups, whatever). Now you’re getting it, and all you can do is complain? What’s wrong with you? Besides, you’ll go see it anyhow.”

So, allow me to present a metaphor.


If the “chocolate” ice cream you’re trying to serve me has nuts and fruit mixed in, and tastes more like raspberry than chocolate, than the argument that I can now have chocolate ice cream in a shake, or a sundae, or a float, and for the first time ever, can have it with strawberry ice cream and vanilla ice cream, instead of just having it on the cone, forgive me if I’m not grateful for the fact that there is chocolate ice cream being served at all.

Especially when I can go down the street and get mint chocolate chip from your competitor.

And before someone says “But you haven’t even tasted it yet,” that’s true. But I can still develop an expectation based on previous experiences and what I can see. If I don’t like strawberries, and I can see chunks of strawberry in the ice cream, it’s reasonable for to believe I won’t like the ice cream after I’ve tasted it.

I may still taste it eventually, but I might wait awhile to do so, and might go buy a new type of ice cream from your competitor first, and only try your strawberry concoction when I get around to it.


Now, I’m not excusing nerd rage. Because that crap has gotten ridiculous – and there are fans who really need to relax. But so is saying that having criticisms is ridiculous and we should just be happy to get a movie featuring these characters at all.

No. I am allowed to not like what I’m seeing, politely say so, and spend my money elsewhere.

Someone asked me, when I first presented this metaphor, if I had a specific film in mind when writing this. And while I did, I had to ask if it really mattered? Because arguably one persons reasons for not liking the new female Thor could fit this analogy, while another persons feelings about Superman vs. Batman could fit, while another persons being upset with Marvel reprinting Miracleman could fit. While it’s certainly true that some of the negative responses to these things have been overblown, there are also many legitimate reasons to have criticisms. If you don’t like the news about the new Thor because you’re a misogynist, you should be called on it. If you don’t like Sam taking over for Steve because you’re a racist and Captain America is the Aryan Superman, you should be called on it. But if you don’t like it because you’re not a fan of mantle-passing in the comics at all? That’s legitimate.

wonder27f-2-webIn my case, I did write this about Superman/Batman. While I never minded any of the casting, I felt like Man of Steel was too dark – in tone and in visual style. The reveal of the footage from SDCC, and Gadot’s costume have only confirmed for me that this DC Cinematic Universe, much like their New 52, is not to my taste and liking.

I may still go see Dawn of Justice (although not until after I see Cap 3 if they stay on the same weekend), but I do not like what I’m seeing so far.

I do think that nerd-raging over the costume, or Gadot, or Affleck is silly. And that’s not what I’m doing. I’m not filled with rage, I’m just not seeing anything so far that is filling me with confidence for the film, meaning I thinking I’ll give it a pass, or at least a long delay. But when I say something like that, there are some who respond “Hey, be happy you’re getting Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman in a live-action film at all. Don’t criticize.”

And I reject that. Not criticizing is why the studios were able to give us Superman IV and Batman and Robin. And at a time that there are really good superhero films being released, why should I settle for something that I don’t think looks good, just because it has some of my favorite characters in it?


  1. Christian Ashlar says:

    Well said!

  2. There is definitely this strange vein of “you should spend your money and be happy regardless of the quality / tone / direction of the film” that does pop up. I don’t understand it either!